Project Gish

Cortical

Hey all! This forum will hopefully be a collaborative attempt at theorycrafting a gish that is viable and fun to play. If any of you have created a gish before and went in blind, you probably came in expecting:

A jack of all trades
🍏🍏🍏 "This odd job is one of the most powerful odd jobs. It is, at its most well-equipped, capable of performing roughly as well as a bad/poor example of a mainstream (non-odd) job. At certain levels, it may even be briefly as powerful as a mainstream job."
3.

4.

But given the difficulty assigning AP and the awful accuracy issues you faced as a result, your gish probably looked for like:

RIP GishGallop my lvl 36 F/P gish, deleted (soon, i'll get to it), to be forgotten (you were not fun)

But there are a number of fun reasons to make a gish. Namely:

You are really the only oddjob that gets to use the full value of every stat so items like Zakum helms are fantastically cost efficient (gishlets dont seem to need the int as much as they usually go the f/p route)
With a comparable magic hit rate, you can outdamage LUK mages (aka magelets), hence the 🍏🍏🍏
You have one of the most, if not the most, unique playstyles of all the oddjobs.

However, there are also disadvantages

You will likely need a tonne of funding for the LUK equips you need
Your physical damage will be worse than gishlets, str mages, and beginners

However, the expensive items you need can also be used on other oddjobs. LUK equips can be used on like besinners and permarogues, and your WAtk shield can be used on your many oddjobs that equip daggers or other 1H weapons.

Ok, so let's get to the pros and cons of job advancements first

1. F/P Gish
Pro:
Poison Mist is super strong on gishes and you may be the fastest grinder of all the gishes

Con:
I personally don't see the point of adding int if youre mainly going to use poison mist and you may be a lot stronger as a gishlet.

2. Gish-OP
Pro:

The best PQ utility of every gish
Heal damage scales with LUK and you will have a LOT of LUK so it seems like a no-brainer to go this route in terms of damage
Loads of very useful skills like holy symbol

Con:
You MAY spend most of your time played healing so it doesn't have as unique of a playstyle unless you grind

3. I/L Gish
(I'll probably make this one)
Pros:

Good mobbing ability by 2nd job
Can slow and freeze monsters for easy basic attacking
Probably the most unique oddjob because str mage will go the priest route and gishlets will go the f/p route

Cons:
None, its perfect and i love it and will make it (pls keep disagreements to yourself, i need the motivation)

4. Permamagician dex dagger HP gish
Pro:
If you grind (no PQ!) one of these bad boys to level 70, deer will pass her leadership of the oddjobs guild to you (we have a verbal contract and I trust that she will uphold the deal)

Cons:

Need to HP wash a bit for the HP aspect (probably 2 dex 2 int 1 HP and then change this to accomodate washing)*
I think I'd rather die??
*against the rules but that wont matter past 70 😉

Equipment

You will probably want a tonne of LUK equips because it gives both magic and physical accuracy. It also has the advantage of being the cheapest stat an item can have. Here are the items I will assume our model gish will have:

10 luk earrings
20 luk bathrobe
10 watk, 5str shield
+3 all stat valentines ring
+5 all stat dep star
You probably want a watk glove, possibly a pink marker for its LUK, but I will not factor this into our model gish
Zakum Helm (+15 all stats will be assumed. This will probably be scrolled for dex (+12 dex for a 6/10 helm with 60% scrolls will be assumed but I think INT may be preferable if you're absolutely loaded because you need the magical accuracy)
You will be constantly on accuracy pills if you might miss
Coke pills will probably be preferred because you benefit from both the watk and matk. Early on, you will benefit from the fact it doesn't reduce accuracy.
A blue wisconsin with 8 accuracy for the early levels (probably not the best item but whatevs i have one hehe)

Ok with that out of the way, now onto weapons. There isn't as much to say early on tbh, you probably want a one-handed weapon that has both watk and matk, so pick and choose from here. You may want to scroll your early items with 60% scrolls just for some extra damage as you'll be very weak. After 70, you could go for a black umbrella but I personally think that a kebob would be an amazing item on gishes at level 75. It has 5 more matk on average and although it has less watk, daggers' attack multiplier is much better than swords'. Further, scrolling it with daggers for ATT will give it some luk, which is very nice for your accuracies. Afterwards, you can move onto an arcglaive if you want.

Some other items include

A WAtk palette for the extra LUK it gives (because you probably wont be scrolling a maple magician shield for WAtk.) You could also use a maple shield I guess but that's expensive af.
Flamekeeper's Cordon for obvious reasons.
A nice mage shoe will be nice. You will have the LUK requirements fulfilled but may struggle in the INT department.
Choose your face/eye accessory as you please but WAcc isnt as big of an issue.

Now for the hard part, AP

This is the particularly difficult part of Project Gish™ and is the area I want help theorycrafting the most. My opinions coming into this area are:

I don't like missing, it isn't fun
I want my gish to use its skills for mobbing primarily or debuffing and basic attacks for single target

Due to the complicated nature AP assignment, I don't think it's productive to talk about how much of each stat you want to add per level. Rather, I'm going to give goals for each stat at certain milestones and I would like input about alternative stat goals that you think are better. These are pretty rough numbers and should be treated as such. Accuracy will be calculated with https://mrsoupman.github.io/Maple-ACC-calculator/

Level 30
Base stats:
STR: 55
DEX: 4
INT: 53
LUK: 57

After Equips
STR: 63
DEX: 7
INT: 56
LUK: 90

This will give you 68 WAcc (58 without accuracy pills), which will give you a 100% hit rate against genins (51.5 Acc needed for 100%). You magic hit rate against genins will be 96.4%.

Level 50
Base:
STR: 105
DEX: 4
INT: 103
LUK: 57

After Equips:
STR: 133
DEX: 43
INT: 126
LUK: 110

This will give you 119 WAcc (109 without accuracy pills), which will give you a 100% hit rate against Papa Pixie (105 Acc needed for 100%). Your magic hit rate against Papa Pixie will be 79.5%.

Level 70
Base:
STR: 155
DEX: 4
INT: 153
LUK: 57

After Equips:
STR: 183
DEX: 43
INT: 176
LUK: 110

This will give you 119 WAcc (109 without accuracy pills), which will give you a 100% hit rate against Voodoos (112 Acc needed for 100%). Your magic hit rate against Voodoos will be 91.3% (94% with 180 INT).

Your hit rate against Greatest Oldies will be 31.1% (182 Acc needed for 100%). Your magic hit rate against Greatest Oldies will be 40.4% (44.8% with 180 INT).

Level 76
Basing your AP distribution on the previous one, at 76, you could have
Base:
STR: 170
DEX: 4
INT: 168
LUK: 57

After Equips:
STR: 198
DEX: 43
INT: 191
LUK: 110

Your magic hit rate against Voodoos will be 98.8% (physical was 100% at 70).

Your hit rate against Greatest Oldies will be 61.7%. Your magic hit rate against Greatest Oldies will be 73.3%

Higher accuracy alternative for CD grind
If you want more accuracy against CDs, you could go:

Base:
STR: 110
DEX: 4
INT: 108
LUK: 177

After Equips:
STR: 138
DEX: 43
INT: 131
LUK: 230

This will give you 179 WAcc (169 without accuracy pills), which will give you a 100% hit rate against Greatest Oldies (147 needed for 100%). Your magic hit rate against Greatest Oldies will be 91.3%).

Compromise between the two builds
Base:
STR: 140
DEX: 4
INT: 138
LUK: 117

After Equips:
STR: 168
DEX: 43
INT: 161
LUK: 170

This will give you 149 WAcc (139 accuracy pills), which will give you a 100% hit rate against Greatest Oldies. Your magic hit rate against Greatest Oldies will be 83.3%).

deer

I personally don't see the point of adding int if youre mainly going to use poison mist and you may be a lot stronger as a gishlet.

Poison Mist is mostly a third job skill, so during first, second, and fourth jobs, that INT will definitely help. And even during third job, where you will obviously be wanting to mist train your way to victory, any time that you find yourself fighting a boss, you'll have no way to mist them (as they are immune to poison). So you can, at least, still do good magic and physical damage in those cases.

Coke pills will probably be preferred because you benefit from both the watk and matk. Early on, you will benefit from the fact it doesn't reduce accuracy.

If you were worried about Ciders, the WACC debuff from Ciders is totally irrelevant, because you can use literally any WACC buff to cancel it out (e.g. Sniper Pills). I think gishes (and even gishlets) are starved for physical damage enough that you will want to be on Ciders basically any time that you're physically attacking. CZPs are good for the MATK buff if you don't have Meditation yet (or you're a cleric/priest/bishop who doesn't get access to it), although Wizard Elixirs are still superior (just less meso-efficient).

[...] you probably want a one-handed weapon that has both watk and matk [...]

Yeah, so, I think we need to catalogue exactly which mage skills are and are not usable with two-handed weapons, so that we can figure out exactly how useful weapons like the Super Snowboard and Crimson Arcglaive (both polearms) are. I'll have to test the ones I have.

deer

So, before getting into any of the hard details and numbers and calculations here (which we do want to do), I think it behooves us to really work out some of the basic conceptual reasoning at work here. Then, maybe, once we run some numbers and do some planning, some of the concepts can be refined/revised.

First, we want to make some simplifying assumptions:

4 base DEX. Always. The reasoning here is that gishes are more starved for MACC than WACC (and DEX contributes only to WACC, not to MACC), and also more starved for melee damage than magic damage (and while DEX does contribute to melee damage and not magical damage, STR contributes more, so we want as much STR as possible, instead).
We are only looking at second and third job I/L gishes. Because @Cortical is dead-set on I/L gishes (and because I/Ls are the archetypical gishes, even if F/P and cleric ones are perfectly good as well), we are focussing there. We don't consider first job because you don't have any multi-target attacks at that point. And we don't consider fourth job because we don't expect to get there (and that would kinda break things anyways, since at that point you have Chain Lightning and Blizzard!).

Accuracy?

So, perhaps first and foremost, gishes have accuracy issues. One of our issues is that we don't know exactly how MACC works yet (although we should hopefully fix that soon). However, we do know some things, and this is all we need to keep in mind when figuring out how to think about accuracy for gishes:

STR is the only one of the four stats that does not contribute to accuracy in any way.
Each point of DEX contributes 0.8 WACC, and each point of LUK contributes 0.5 WACC.
INT and LUK contribute equally to MACC (they are interchangeable w.r.t. MACC).
DEX does not contribute to MACC, and INT does not contribute to WACC.
As clearly evidenced by @Cortical's initial experiments with accuracy, gishes tend to have more of a MACC deficit than a WACC deficit. This is perhaps to be expected, since some WACC-starved ("WACC-starved", to distinguish from high-WACC physical attackers like non-odd archers) jobs, like non-odd warriors, are still expected to pump the large majority (or even all) of their AP into STR and still hit stuff. On the other hand, only mages have to worry about MACC, and they are expected to spend every single AP that they get on some combination of LUK and INT. So MACC requirements are naturally steeper, to accomodate for this game design.

With all of this in mind, one possible route to go down is this: we want to calculate the base stats that you would need to equalise your probability to magically hit with your probability to physically hit. In order to get a simple enough model for this, we can:

Again, as stated above, assume 4 base DEX.
We assume that all monsters that the gish fights are at or below the gish's level. This simplifies accuracy calculation, while still being more-or-less realistic.
Map out a realistic set of equipment that you might be using at a series of given level ranges.

Once you have the gear planned out, you can consider, for each level range, a particular level in that range. Then, allocate your base stats in a way that seems more-or-less reasonable (perhaps using the stat arrays in @Cortical's original post). Then, considering those base stats in addition to the stats bestowed by your equipment, calculate your probability to physically hit vs. a monster with an arbitrary AVOID. Then, adjust the AVOID value (if necessary) until the probability of physically hitting is significantly more than 0, and significantly less than 1 (a good example would be a probability of 0.5, although it doesn't have to be exactly in between 0 and 1). Then, calculate the probability of magically hitting vs. this AVOID; if this second probability significantly differs from the probability of physically hitting, then adjust the base stat array until the two values are "close enough". The exact difference that one considers acceptable (some ε such that |physHitProb - magicHitProb| < ε) is obviously arbitrary to at least some degree, but there should be a solution where we can minimise the difference, and we can then call that the "ideal", at least w.r.t. accuracy.

Realistically though, for any given gish character that you make, you probably want to generate a few realistic cases where you calculate your gish's accuracies. This includes:

Mapping out a series of training locations (Genins, CDs, etc., wherever you plan to train throughout your gish's lifetime), including the rough level range for when you would be training there.
Possibly, also mapping out a series of bosses that you want to be able to fight (including but not limited to, for example, PQ bosses like Papa Pixie, etc.), including a rough level range for when you would be fighting such bosses. The idea, as we will see later on, is that your melee capabilities shine when doing single-target DPS tasks like fighting bosses.
Mapping out a realistic set of equipment that you might be using at a given level range.

Once you can separate all this out into a number of discrete cases (each case being a particular level that you're at, combined with a monster that you're fighting, combined with a particular set of gear that you're using), you can basically see what kind of stats & equipment you would need to train there. But the above-mentioned optimisation approach (trying to keep the probabilities of physically and magically hitting as close as possible) seems like the kind of thing you want for allocating base stats. Otherwise, it would seem that you are leaving one of your attacking modes in the dust by leaving its accuracy worse off. However, because MACC is so much more difficult to get, and because accuracy in general (particularly WACC in this case, but hopefully also MACC!) tends to become much less important after a certain point (take, for example, the buccaneer guide on the MapleLegends forums, which cites a figure of ≈201 WACC for an endgame physical attacker to hit everything that is "relevant" to them), considering things case-by-case is very important.

Ultimately, you might want to look at all of your cases (all training locations, all bosses), and just pick out the one with the highest AVOID. Then, you can work to make your probability of physically and of magically hitting a monster with such an AVOID hit 1 (that is, 100% hit chance) at roughly the same time. After that point, you can just consider damage, and pump STR (and maybe even, especially if you upgrade gear, put some into INT and possibly reset out of LUK) for that.

Damage?

So, as mentioned by @Cortical in the original post, it would seem that the ideal of the gish is to focus on melee for single-target DPS, and on magic for multi-target DPS (and for other utility, of course). So, then, our current working thesis is that we want our melee DPS to at least somewhat exceed the single-target DPS of the gish's current best magic attack. When we say "single-target DPS", we mean that, for example, Thunderbolt hits up to 6 monsters, but w.r.t. single-target DPS, we only consider the damage taken by one such monster at a time. And when we say "best magic attack", we mean the one that currently has the highest single-target DPS; we will assume that all monsters are neutral towards all elements, to simplify things. We will also assume that all monsters have identical WDEF and MDEF values (in general, this is not true, but it works as an idealisation, because some have higher WDEF, some higher MDEF, some have them equal).

Again, we need to split things out into cases. At different levels, the gish will be using different magic attacks of differing power levels, they will be using different equipment (including weapons), they will have different base stat distributions, etc. So we need to "[m]ap out a series of training locations" (and possibly also "series of bosses"), along with "[m]apping out a realistic set of equipment that you might be using at a given level range". From here, you can choose a particular level for the gish, and then calculate your damage either against a mock monster (using a typical WDEF value for that level, and using the above assumption that WDEF = MDEF), or against the monster(s) you'd be training at/bosses you'd be fighting at about that level.

The thing with magic damage is that there seems to be a kind of "critical region", after which your magic damage doesn't increase very much (at least, not nearly as much as before the region) with the kind of TMA (total magic attack) growth that you can get from leveling up and getting new gear. We all know that pure INT mages (i.e. normal mages) dominate KPQ, alongside DEXless rogues; but after that point, mages can pretty much only flex their multi-target capabilities (with few exceptions). So:

After a certain point, I would expect accuracy to be less of an issue (as mentioned above). So at some point, no more AP will be spent on LUK, and those AP can be spent on some combination of STR and INT.
After a certain point, I would expect INT to have diminishing enough returns that you don't really want to put many (if any) points into it anyways.
Therefore, at some point, you will be pumping mostly (or exclusively) STR.

Cortical

1st job skill build and more sophisticated numbers with AP

Before diving in, I'm going to list out the items I used to model these numbers. I will also consider my level benchmarks to be 41 (max thunderbolt), 50 (get Zhelm) AND 86 (max ice strike, Ravana helm, finish MPQ). level 100 (max elemental amp and spell booster) will be done some other time when im bothered :p (voodoos at level 70 might also be a useful reference level, and also considering how this all works with an accuracy mask or whatever)

Helmets:
Lvl 20-49: +8 acc blue wisconsin
Lvl 50-69: Zakum Helmet (+15 all stats, +20 acc)
Lvl 70+: +Ravana helmet (+18 all stats clean, +8 dex from scrolls, +10 acc)

Other equips:
16 luk bathrobe
12 watk 7 str shield
10 watk gloves
10 luk earrings
Ring of passion (+3 all stats)
Squishy shoes (+1 all stats)
8 luk cape
Dep star (+5 all stats)

Weapons:
level 41: Yellow umbrella (64 watk, 4str)
level 50: Diao chan sword (80 watk, 6 str)
Level 81+: Kebob (97 watk, 5 luk)
Probably a bit weak, you may want a better kebob than this

Buffs
Ciders (20 watk)
Accuracy Pills (10 Acc)
Max Meditation or Wizard Elixirs (20 matk)

1st job skill build

One major issue I've encountered with the gish is that if the point is to use melee with single targets and magic with multiple targets, magic claw will get in the way because it just does so much damage compared to your melee hits. My initial solution was for future gish makers was to just not get spells and instead max magic armour and play like a str mage (but with luk instead of dex). On second thoughts, I think another nifty solution is to keep magic claw at a level that's usable but will not threaten the utility of your melee hits, so probably somewhere between level 10-15. It's up to you which solution you choose.

AP distribution and basis of these stats

In my initial post, I gave some AP distributions that give you reasonably solid accuracy. However, accuracy was the only goal of those stats and the rules for stat distribution were pretty basic:

If weapon hit rate > 98% and magic hit rate > 70-90% (goal magic hit rate depended on level)

if base str > base int, add int

else, add str

If weapon hit rate > 98% and magic hit rate < 70-90%

if base str > base int, add int

else, add luk

Else (if weapon hit rate < 98%)

add luk

Here, melee and magic dps that those stats gave was ignored and this was a major issue in practice because my magic damage following that guide was almost always better than my melee damage. In these new numbers, I use more sophisticated rules with the constraint that for a certain mob that I'm training on, my magic dps should be around 75% of my melee dps. In effect, the defence values of mobs had a negligible effect on the stat distribution. I also prioritised keeping my melee hit rate high because it's not fun to miss. Here are the rules:

If weapon hit rate < 95%,

add luk

else, if (base str + base dex) < base int

add str

else, if melee dps < spell dps * 1.33333

if the damage gained by adding luk > the damage gained by adding str, add luk

else, add str

else, if melee dps > spell dps * 1.33333

if you have enough AP to set your (after items) luk or int to the next increment of 10

if the damage you gain from adding int > the damage gained by adding luk, add enough int to reach the next increment of 10 (remember, these values are different)

else, add enough luk to reach the next increment of 10

else, add int

Now, for AP distribution.
NOTE: My code calculates both accuracy and DPS but there are minor discrepancies between it and both deer's damage calculator and mrsoupman's accuracy calculator. I will use their numbers instead of the one my code generated, but note that the stat distribution is based on the dps calculated by my code because it accounts for hitrate.

Level 41

Reference mob is Genin (Level 25, 20 WDEF, 35 MDEF, 14 Avoid)
Spell is thunderbolt.

BASE STATS
STR: 126
DEX: 4
INT: 71
LUK: 24

TOTAL STATS
STR: 141
DEX: 7
INT: 74
LUK: 62
WAcc: 54.6

Weapon Hit Rate: 100%
Weapon DPS: 429
Magic Hit Rate: 91.3%
Magic DPS: 311

Level 50

Reference mob is Master Chronos (Level 46, 170 WDEF, 200 MDEF, 24 Avoid). Spell is thunderbolt.

BASE STATS
STR: 128
DEX: 4
INT: 114
LUK: 24

TOTAL STATS
STR: 165
DEX: 28
INT: 136
LUK: 82
WAcc: 93

Weapon Hit Rate: 100%
Weapon DPS: 526.4
Magic Hit Rate: 88.2%
Magic DPS: 395.8

Level 86

Reference mob is Greatest Oldies (Level 76, 400 WDEF, 450 MDEF, 40 Avoid). Spell is ice strike. You realistically want to use an elemental staff for these mobs but calculations will be done with a kebob nonetheless.

BASE STATS
STR: 206
DEX: 4
INT: 114
LUK: 126

TOTAL STATS
STR: 240
DEX: 39
INT: 139*
LUK: 192
WAcc: 147
*you need the extra 1 luk for 100% melee hits.

Weapon Hit Rate: 100%
Weapon DPS: 792.407
Magic Hit Rate: 80.2%
Magic DPS: 589

As you can see, you really need to really pump base luk at this level, which is maximally unsexy. Unfortunately, if you remove the aforementioned rule that:

If weapon hit rate < 95%, add luk,

nothing changes about the AP distribution at every reference level (no that's kinda neat because I didn't even have to specify it).

deer

Level 81+: Kebob (97 watk, 5 luk)

[...]

magic claw will get in the way because it just does so much damage compared to your melee hits

I think that simply not spending any SP on attacking spells that are exclusively single-target (like Magic Claw, although I would probably make an exception for Poison Breath, because you can use it to poison first, and then whack the monster while it is taking poison DoT) is a good "solution" here, although I think it's more of a gish's playstyle choice, just because they will be using melee for single-target DPS anyways. However, I want to question the choice of Kebob here, because while I understand why it is such a good gish weapon (good for TMA, good for WATK, and can be scrolled for WATK+LUK), and I think it's a perfectly good choice, I do wonder what this experiment would look like if you chose weapons that were oriented further away from TMA. The reality of the Kebob is that it just kinda sucks for melee attacks; its WATK is really not that impressive (82 WATK avg. clean at level 75), and it has a speed category of 5, which is the slowest possible speed for a dagger. This is why, despite the fact that Kebobs and Fans are equally equippable by STRginners, and despite the fact that the Kebob is 10 full levels higher, the Fan remains a favourite, while the Kebob is rarely even mentioned (other than to say how bad it is). Fans are just 2 full speed categories faster (3), while not losing much WATK (78 WATK avg. clean).

That's not to say that you should be using the Fan (although I think it's worth considering), but rather, maybe you could try treating your weapon choices more similarly to a STRginner than you are now. This would, in itself, put your melee attacks further ahead of your magical attacks in terms of single-target DPS. Because you already aren't having many issues with WACC, the extra base INT that you might be pumping as a result of this would not hurt much (and would still contribute to your MACC).

I think that, in this case --- or, in any case --- you might want to set your goal for single-target magical DPS lower. Right now, you've chosen ~75%, which is fine, but perhaps something closer to ~50% would work as well. If you chose, for example, 50%, then that would make the aggregate DPS between your melee and magical attacks break even when attacking exactly 2 monsters with your magic, and then make your magical aggregate DPS exceed the aggregate DPS of your melee attacks when attacking >2 monsters with your magic.

If weapon hit rate > 98% and magic hit rate > 70-90% (goal magic hit rate depended on level)

[...]

If weapon hit rate > 98% and magic hit rate >70-90%

I'm having a little trouble reading this... afaict, these two conditions are identical(?)

Same thing here:

else, if melee dps > spell dps * 1.33333

[...]

else, if melee dps > spell dps * 1.33333

...but I think the first one just has the inequality flipped. That being said, I like this second iteration of the base stat distribution logic.

With your level 41 test:

WAcc: 54

This is maybe kind of a nitpick, but this value can't be right; I think you meant to write 54.6 here, not 54.0.

Also, another nitpick: I try to be more careful when talking about "DPS"; specifying when you are talking about single-target DPS specifically (and specifying when you are talking about other kinds, like aggregate DPS or whatever) might be important in this context, to avoid confusion.

Cortical

deer 'm having a little trouble reading this... afaict, these two conditions are identical(?)

I've corrected the inequalities.

deer t; I think you meant to write 54.6 here, not 54.0.

Yes, i meant to write 54.6 but I rounded down because I wasn't sure if accuracy only cares for integers.

Cortical

Level 70

Here are some quick lvl 70 numbers using a 5 str 100watk black umbrella with 90 matk (and a rav helm.) Also, I just realised my bathrobe gives +2 acc from the 10/30% scrolls.

BASE STATS
STR: 183
DEX: 4
INT: 159
LUK: 24

TOTAL STATS
STR: 222
DEX: 39
INT: 184
LUK: 85
WAcc: 93.7

Weapon Hit Rate: 100%
Weapon DPS: 813.5
Magic Hit Rate: 100%
Magic DPS: 697.3

Unfortunately, you will never reach the goal stats required for CDs by 86 following this build so perhaps the best build might be:

BASE STATS
STR: 183
DEX: 4
INT: 114
LUK: 69